11/17/2023 0 Comments Architecture and morality![]() ![]() Creating Architectural Theory: the Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Marx and Modern Political Theory: from Hobbes to Contemporary Feminism. “Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: the Sociology of a Door-Closer.” Social Problems 35(3):298–310. “Regulating Design: the Practices of Architecture, Governance and Control.” Urban Studies 46(12):2507–18. “Peter Paul Verbeek as a Postphenomenological Mirror.” Philosophy and Technology 25(4):610–15. ![]() “Editorial Statements.” Perspecta 35:4–5. “Ethics, Culture, and Structure in the Negotiation of Straw Bale Building Codes.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 31(3):261–88. “Towards Shared Space.” Urban Design International 13:130–8. “Architecture of Deceit.” Perspecta 21:110–15. Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison. Retrieved 27 April 2014 ( ).įoucault, Michel. “A Dictator’s Guide to Urban Design: Ukraine’s Independence Square, and the Revolutionary Dimensions of Public Spaces.” The Atlantic. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.įord, Matt. Ethics for Architects: 50 Dilemmas of Professional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.įisher, Thomas. The Fabrication of Virtue: English Prison Architecture, 1750–1840. Berkeley: University of California Press.Įvans, Robin. Harpenden: Pocket Essentials.ĭe Certeau, Michel. “Humans not Instruments.” Spontaneous Generations: a Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 4(1):138–147.Ĭoverley, Merlin. “Written and Unwritten Building Conventions in a Contested City: the Case of Belfast.” Urban Studies 46(12):2669–89.Ĭollins, Harry. New York, NY: Princeton Architecture Press.īrand, Ralf. 372–82 in Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture, edited by K. “Communitarianism and Emotivism: Two Rival Views of Ethics and Architecture.” Pp. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.īeck, Ulrich. Ethical Land Use: Principles of Policy and Planning. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity.īeatley, Timothy. Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.īauman, Zygmunt. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.īauman, Zygmunt. 259–64 in Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by W.E. “A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies.” Pp. ![]() Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.Īkrich, Madeleine and Bruno Latour. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īicher, Otl. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. But do all these examples then amount to moral agency in architecture? Specifically, what form can moral agency take in architecture? And how is such moral agency represented or embodied in what architects build, if at all? Can architecture then, as the intended construction of material artefacts by humans (Müller and Reichmann, this volume), have some kind of moral agency? Little work, if any, has been done to address these questions. This embodiment can occur either incidentally (Sorkin 2011:143) or, unexpectedly so, often quite deliberately (Scott 1980 Evans 1982 Singley 1993 McDonough and Braungart 2002 Henderson 2006 Sennett 2008 Moore 2012 Ford 2014 Quinn 2014). Not only do architects espouse some kind of ethics (Till 2009 Fisher 2010), but such ethics are often represented or embodied in what architects subsequently design and craft as architecture. What does moral agency mean in architecture? This question should pique every science and technology studies (STS) scholar and architectural theorist. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |